Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361 , 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Paul H. A
Summary: ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361 , 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Paul H. An..
More
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson
Associate Justice
